Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WP227 No. 303 of 2024 Jogendra Pradhan S/o Satyanand Pradhan, Aged About 34 Years R/o Village- Chhichhor, Umariya, Tahsil Pusore, District Raigarh (C.G.)
... Petitioner(s) versus Smt. Soumya W/o Jogendra Pradhan, Aged About 30 Years R/o Village Chhichhor, Umariya, Tahsil Pusore, District Raigarh (C.G.) At Present R/o Village Badmal, Police Station And Tahsil Bhathali, District Bargarh (Odisha)
... Respondent(s) For Petitioner : Mr. Shikhar Sharma, Advocate For Respondent : Mr. Sanjay Agrawal, Advocate Hon’ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Order On Board 12-09-2025 1) Mr. Sanjay Agrawal, counsel for the respondent submits that an application moved under Order 9 Rule 13 of CPC was allowed vide order dated 23.02.2024 and against said order, this petition has been preferred. He further submits that Civil Suit No. 148/2022 pending before learned Family Court, Raigarh has been dismissed for want of prosecution vide order dated 14.07.2025 and he has also produced a copy of said order. 2) Taking into consideration the submission made by Mr. Agrawal, in Digitally signed by AJINKYA PANSARE Date: 2025.09.12 16:24:04 +0530
2 the opinion of this Court, nothing survives for adjudication. Consequently, this petition stands dismissed being rendered infructuous. 3) However, petitioner would be at liberty to revive if cause of action subsists.
Sd/- (Rakesh Mohan Pandey) JUDGE A j i n k y a