Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 149922 (ALL)

ANUPAM KUMAR v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. BASIC EDUCATION LKO. AND 5 OTHERS

WRIA/7241/2025 · 2025-07-08

Abdul Moin

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:38515 Court No. - 5 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 7241 of 2025 Petitioner :- Anupam Kumar Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Basic Education Lko. And 5 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Krishna Madhav Shukla Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Prashant Kumar Singh Hon'ble Abdul Moin,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents no.1 to 4 and Sri Prashant Kumar Singh, learned counsel for respondent no.5. 2. No notice be issued to respondent no.6 taking into consideration the nature of order proposed to be passed. 3. With the consent of learned counsels for the parties, the writ petition is being decided finally. 4. The contention of learned counsel for the petitioner is that in pursuance to an advertisement dated 28.01.2025, a copy of which is Annexure-3 to the petition, issued by respondent no.5 inviting applications for the post of Academic Resource Person (ARP) the petitioner finding himself eligible had applied. The merit list was drawn up, a copy of which is part of Annexure-4 to the petition, in which the name of the petitioner finds place at serial no.31 while that of respondent no.6 finds place at serial no.32. However, at the time of final allotment dated 02.06.2025, a copy of which is Annexure-1 to the petition, the name of the petitioner does not find place against his desired block and hence the petition. 5. At this stage, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that with regard to the relief sought in the writ petition, the petitioner may be permitted to submit a fresh representation before respondent no.3 which may be directed to be decided within a time frame fixed by this Court to which learned Standing Counsel appearing for respondents has no objection. 6. In view of the above, it is provided that in case the petitioner submits a representation within two weeks from today before respondent no.3 then respondent no.3 shall endevour to decide the same by means of a reasoned and speaking order within a further period of six weeks from the date of submission of the representation along with certified copy of this order. 7. With the aforesaid direction, writ petition is disposed off. 8. It is made clear that this Court has not gone into the merits of the case. Order Date :- 8.7.2025 A. Katiyar Digitally signed by :- AMIT KATIYAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench