1 SA No. 90 of 2021 2025:CGHC:46582 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR SA No. 90 of 2021 1. Smt. Suraj Bai W/o Late Chandrika Prasad Aged About 75 Years Caste Kachhi 2. Devishankar S/o Late Chandrika Prasad Aged About 55 Years Caste Kachhi 3. Smt. Rameshwari D/o Late Chandrika Prasad Aged About 51 Years Caste Kachhi 4. Smt. Ranjeeta D/o Late Chandrika Prasad Aged About 45 Years Caste Kachhi 5. Smt. Ruhi Bai D/o Late Chandrika Prasad Aged About 37 Years Caste Kachhi All are R/o Near Old Bus Stand , Telephone Exchange Road , Bilaspur , Tahsil And District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh. ...Appellants versus 1. Chhedilal Shukla (Died) Through Lrs 1(A) Ashok Kumar Shukla S/o Late Chhedilal Sukla Aged About 55 Years 1(B) Santosh Kumar Shukla S/o Late Chhedilal Shukla Aged About 52 Years 1(C) Shivkumar Shukla S/o Late Chhedilal Shukla Aged About 50 Years All are R/o Village Newra , Tahsil Takhatpur, district Bilaspur Chhattisgarh. 2. Arun Singh Thakur S/o Late Budh Singh Thakur Aged About 58 Years R/o Near Old Bus Stand, Karbala Road House Of Khan , Bilaspur Tahsil And District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh 2 SA No. 90 of 2021 3. Surendra Kashyap @ Bhairo Prasad S/o Shri Umanath Aged About 60 Years R/o Behind Ajeet Hotel , Telipara , Bilaspur , Tahsil And District Bilaspur,Chhattisgarh 4. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Collector, Bilaspur , District Bilaspur,Chhattisgarh. 5. District Registrar (Collector Of Stamp) Bilaspur Chhattisgarh. ... Respondents For Appellants : None For Respondents No.1(A) to 1(C) For Respondents No.2 & 3 For State/ Respondents No.4 & 5 : : : Mr. Sourabh Sharma, Advocate None Ms. Mandvi Bhardwaj, PL (Hon’ble Shri Justice Naresh Kumar Chandravansh i ) Order on Board 11/09/2025 1. On 08.8.2025, learned counsel for appellants had submitted that despite repeated communications made, appellants are not responding, therefore, he is not willing to represent the appellants. In such condition, SPC was directed to be issued for appearance of appellants. 2. SPC issued to the appellants has been reported to have been refused to be accepted by them. 3. Today, despite repeated calls, neither appellants present nor represented by any counsel, as also, SPC has also been refused to be taken by them, in these circumstances, this court has no other option except to dismiss the second appeal for want of prosecution. 4. Accordingly, the instant second appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. SD/- (Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi) JUDGE Ayushi AYUSHI SINGH Digitally signed by AYUSHI SINGH Date: 2025.09.15 11:13:52 +0530