2025:UHC:9534-DB HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. G. NARENDAR AND HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SUBHASH UPADHYAY 29TH OCTOBER, 2025 WRIT PETITION (CRL) NO. 1001 OF 2025 M/s Techto Structures …...Petitioner. Versus State of Uttarakhand & others …….Respondents. Counsel for the Petitioner : None. Counsel for the State : Mr. J.S. Virk, learned Deputy Advocate General with Mr. R.K. Joshi, learned Brief Holder. JUDGMENT :(per Mr. G. Narendar, C.J.) Case is called. There is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. 2. Learned Deputy Advocate General would submit that pursuant to the orders of this Court, the parties have come to an amicable solution. In that view, he would submit that the petition does not call for any further orders. 3. The submission of learned Deputy Advocate General is placed on record. 4. The petition is dismissed as having been rendered infructuous, in light of the settlement said to 1 2025:UHC:9534-DB have arrived at between the parties. 5. Pending application, if any, also stands disposed of. 6. There shall be no order as to costs. 7. As a sequel thereto, pending application, if any, shall stand closed. ________________ G. NARENDAR, C.J. __________________ SUBHASH UPADHYAY, J. Dated: 29th October, 2025 NISHANT 2