Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 14989 (AP)

DUGGINENI RAMALAKSHUMMMA @ DUGGINENI LAKSHMI DEVI v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

WP/9970/2025 · 2025-04-21

Venkateswarlu Nimmagadda

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: 9970 OF 2025 Between: Duggineni Ramalakshummma @ Duggineni Lakshmi Devi, W/o Late Gurraiah @ Pichaiah, aged 50 years, R/o Vankamarri Village, S.A. Kasinayana Mandal, Y.S. R. Kadapa District. ...PETITIONER AND 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep by its Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Secretariat Buildings Vegalapudi, Amaravathi. 2. The District Collector, Y.S.R.Kadapa District, Kadapa. 3. The Badvel Revenue DivisionalOfficer, Badvel,Y.S.R. Kadapa District. 4. The Tashsildar, S.A.Kasinayana Revenue Mandal, Y.S.R. Kadapa District. 5. The Village Revenue Officer of Itikulapadu, S.A.Kasinayana Revenue Mandal, Y.S.R. Kadapa District. 6. Gajulapalli Narayanamma, W/o Gurivireddy, aged not known to the Petitioner, R/o Uppaluru Village, S.A. Kasinayana Mandal, Y.S. R. Kadapa District. 7. Smt. Palakolanu Rukminamma, W/o Ramireddy, aged 38 years, R/o Uppaluru Village, S.A. Kasinayana Mandal, Y.S. R. Kadapa District. 8. Gajulapalli Padmavathi, W/o Krishna Reddy, aged not known to the Petitioner, R/o Uppaluru Village, S.A. Kasinayana Mandal, Y.S. R. Kadapa District. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, Order of direction more particularly a Writ in the nature of Mandamus declaring the action of the 2"'' to 4*^ respondents not Cancel the Agricultural Pattas and remove the Online Entries of the to 8'^ respondents for lands, for an extent of Ac. 2-82 cents, 2-82 and 2-81 cents respectively in Sy. No. 1197, situated Vankamarri Village, S.A. Kasinayana Mandal, Kadapa District, as these Pattas were granted without cancelled the Petitioner Patta Dis No.503/1417 Fasile/ dated 16-03-2007 by considering Representation/Appeal dated 13-02-2023 which is pending before the 3rd respondent is illegal, arbitrary, contrary to the Provisions of the ROR Act the Petitioner and violation of Principal of Natural Justice and also violation fundamental Rights under the Constitution of India. lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support Of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 3'^'^ respondent to Representation/Appeal dated 13-02-2023 for Cancellation the Agricultural Pattas and remove the Online Entries of the 6th to 8th respondents for lands, for an extent of Ac. 2-82 cents, 2-82 and 2-81 cents respectively in Sy. No. 1197, situated Vankamarri Village, S.A. Kasinayana Mandal, Kadapa District, as these Pattas were granted without cancelled my Patta Dis No.503/1417 Fasile/ dated; 16-03-2007 pending the above Writ Petition. pass orders on the Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI G. SIMHADRI Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 to 5: GP FOR REVENUE Counsel for the Respondent Nos.6 to 8:— The Court made the following: ORDER \ APHC010187582025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3329] MONDAY ,THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: 9970/2025 Between: ...PETITIONER Duggineni Ramalakshummma @ Duggineni Lakshmi Devi AND ...RESPONDENT(S) The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others Counsel for the Petitioner: 1.G SIMHADRI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: 2 ^ ' THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: 9970/2025 ORDER: Sri G.Simhadri, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks 1. permission of this Court to withdraw the Writ Petition with a liberty to file a fresh writ petition. Permission as sought for is accorded. 2. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn with a 3. liberty to the petitioner to file a fresh writ petition. No costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. ] Sd/- P.U.V.BHASKAR RAO ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, 1. One CC to Sri G. Simhadri, Advocate [OPUC] 2. Two CCs to GP for Revenue, High Court of Andhra Pradesh. [OUT] 3. Three CD Copies. ssb % HIGH COURT DATED:21/04/2025 ORDER * 2 2 APR 2025 r ^ . Current Section . WP.No.9970 of 2025 DISMISSING THE W.P. AS WITHDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS