RIYAZ AHMAD RATHER v. BHUPINDER KUMAR AND ORS. (PUBLIC WORKS / ROADS AND BUILDINGS)
CCP(S)/131/2024 · 2025-12-09
Rajesh Sekhri
Writ Petition (Civil)body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 14987 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 14987 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Serial No. 46 Regular Cause list HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR CCP(S) 131/2024 in [WP(C) 2941/2023] RIYAZ AHMAD RATHER …Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s) Through: Mr. Jahangir Ahmad Malik, Advocate Vs.
BHUPINDER KUMAR AND ORS. (PUBLIC WORKS / ROADS AND BUILDINGS)
...Respondent(s) Through: Mr. Waseem Gul, GA
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH SEKHRI, JUDGE.
ORDER 09.12.2025
Mr. Waseem Gul, learned government counsel has produced the statement of facts, which is taken on record, a copy of which has already been furnished to
learned counsel for petitioner. Claim of the petitioner, in the light of order dated 15.11.2023 passed by this Court, which is sought to be enforced by virtue of the present petition, has been considered, found devoid of merit and rejected. In view of the above, since the order passed by this Court stands complied with, the present petition does not survives. Contempt is closed. However, petitioner shall be at liberty to assail the rejection order dated 10.11.2025.
(RAJESH SEKHRI)
JUDGE
Srinagar: 09.12.2025 Adil Ismail