PRAVEEN KUMAR SINGH v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO.
ABAIL/759/2025 · 2025-07-08
Karunesh Singh Pawar
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 149840 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 149840 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:38602 Court No. - 14 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 759 of 2025 Applicant :- Praveen Kumar Singh Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. Counsel for Applicant :- Raj Priya Srivastava Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Karunesh Singh Pawar,J. Heard learned counsel for applicant as well as learned Additional Government Advocate for State. The present application for anticipatory bail has been filed for protection in regard to Case Crime No. 284 of 2023 under Sections 419, 420, 465, 467, 468, 471, 120-B IPC and 4/10 of U.P. Public Examination (Prevention of Unfair Means) Act, 1998, Police Station Madiyaon, District Lucknow. After arguing for some time, applicant's counsel submits that the present application for anticipatory bail may be dismissed as not pressed with liberty to file a regular bail application which may be decided in view of law laid by Supreme Court passed in Special Leave to Appeal (Cri) No.5191 of 2021 "Satender Kumar Antil versus Central Bureau of Investigation and another". Learned A.G.A. has no objection to the prayer of learned counsel for the applicant. In view of the above, present anticipatory bail application is dismissed as not pressed. It is provided that in case a regular bail application is filed within ten days from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order, the same be decided in view of the law laid by by Supreme Court vide order dated 7.10.2021 passed in the case of Satender Kumar Antil (supra). Order Date :- 8.7.2025/R.C. Digitally signed by :- RAM CHANDER YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench