Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 149829 (ALL)

MADHURI @ MADHURI DEVI v. JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE VAAHYA NYAYALAY LALGANJ PRATAPGARH AND 6 OTHERS

A483/528/2025 · 2025-07-09

Subhash Vidyarthi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:38945 Court No. - 15 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 483 No. - 528 of 2025 Applicant :- Madhuri @ Madhuri Devi Opposite Party :- Judicial Magistrate Vaahya Nyayalay Lalganj Pratapgarh And 6 Others Counsel for Applicant :- Rajesh Kumar Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Subhash Vidyarthi,J. 1. Heard Sri Rajesh Kumar Singh, the learned counsel for the applicant, as well as Sri Hansraj Verma, the learned A.G.A. for the State, and perused the record. 2. By means of the instant application, the applicant has sought issuance of a direction for expeditious disposal of Case No.694 of 2022 (State Vs. Rakesh Kumar Kori and others), arising out of Case Crime No.200/2021, under Sections 498(A), 504 and 34 IPC lodged at Police Station Udaypur, Pratapgarh, pending in the Court of Judicial Magistrate, Vaahya Nyayalay, Lalganj Ajhara, Pratapgarh. 3. Copy of the order-sheet of the trial Court annexed with the application indicates that as many as on five dates the advocates were abstaining from work and on two dates the advocates were not present before the trial Court. 4. The trial Court cannot be blamed for the hurdles created in its functioning by the advocates by their non-appearance or by their abstinence from work. In these circumstances, there is no occasion for issuance of any direction to the trial Court for expeditious disposal of the trial/case. 5. The application is rejected. Order Date :- 9.7.2025 MVS/- Digitally signed by :- MANOJ VIKRAM SINGH CHAUHAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench