MOHAMMAD IMRAN v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. REVENUE LKO. AND 6 OTHERS
WRIC/6458/2025 · 2025-07-18
Manish Kumar, Rajan Roy
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 149828 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 149828 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:41260-DB Court No. - 2 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 6458 of 2025 Petitioner :- Mohammad Imran Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue Lko. And 6 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Rajnish Ojha,Triyambakam Shukla Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Rajan Roy,J. Hon'ble Manish Kumar,J.
1. Considering the order proposed to be passed, the issuance of notice to the private opposite parties is dispensed with.
2. Learned Standing Counsel has instructions from S.H.O concerned that the police is not interfering in the construction of the petitioner, however, there was altercation between the rival parties, therefore, the proceedings have been drawn under Section 126/135 B.N.S.S of 2023.
3. If there is a dispute between the petitioner and the private parties, then the remedy is before the court under the law of the land.
4. As regards, the official opposite parties, even they can interfere only as per the law and not otherwise. The opposite party nos. 3 and 4 shall ensure the same.
5. Accordingly, the present writ petition is disposed of. (Manish Kumar, J) (Rajan Roy, J) Order Date :- 18.7.2025 DiVYa Digitally signed by :- DIVYA SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench