KANCHAN KUMARI v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. MEDICAL EDUCATION DEPTT. U.P. LKO. AND 3 OTHERS
WRIA/7212/2025 · 2025-07-08
Abdul Moin
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 149817 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 149817 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:38591 Court No. - 5 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 7212 of 2025 Petitioner :- Kanchan Kumari Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Medical Education Deptt. U.P. Lko. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Prabhakar Pandey,Abhishek Shukla,Aman Pandey,Pushkal Shukla Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Gyanendra Kumar Srivastava,Shubham Tripathi Hon'ble Abdul Moin,J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents no. 1 and 3, Sri Shubham Tripathi, learned counsel for the respondent no. 2 and Sri Gyanendra Kumar Srivastava, learned counsel for the respondent no. 4. With the consent of learned counsel for the parties, the instant writ petition is being finally decided. Contention of learned counsel for the petitioner is that despite the selection having been notified for Staff Nurses and the petitioner having qualified the same yet no appointment order has been issued till date.
Learned counsel for the petitioner after arguing submits that with regard to the relief sought in the writ petition, the petitioner may be permitted to submit a representation before the respondent No.3 which may be directed to be decided within a fixed time frame to which learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents no. 1 and 3, Sri Shubham Tripathi, learned counsel for the respondent no. 2 and Sri Gyanendra Kumar Srivastava, learned counsel for the respondent no. 4 have no objection. In view of the above, it is provided that in case the petitioner submits a representation within ten days from today before the respondent No.3 then the respondent No.3 shall endevour to decide the same by means of a reasoned and speaking order within a further period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order along with representation. With the aforesaid direction, writ petition is disposed of. It is made clear that this Court has not gone into the merits of the case.
Order Date :- 8.7.2025/Pachhere/- Digitally signed by :- SATYENDRA SINGH PACHHERE High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench