HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 8856 of 2020 Court No. - 1 HON'BLE NEERAJ TIWARI, J. HON'BLE VIVEK KUMAR SINGH, J. 1. Heard Ms. Naghma Qadir, Advocate (bearding Enroll. No.A/N0856/2024) holding brief of Sri J.P. Pandey, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondents. 2. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that by efflux of time, the writ petition has become infructuous, therefore, it may be dismissed as infructuous. 3. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed as infructuous. October 13, 2025 Junaid Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : J.P. Pandey Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Pankaj Kumar Shukla (Vivek Kumar Singh,J.) (Neeraj Tiwari,J.) M/S Dinesh Kumar Jindal .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 5 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- JUNAID AHMAD High Court of Judicature at Allahabad