Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 14975 (RAJ)

MOHAN MEMORIAL HOSPITAL PVT. LTD. v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CW/6079/2025 · 2025-04-25

Anoop Kumar Dhand

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:17600] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.6079/2025 Mohan Memorial Hospital Pvt. Ltd., (Company Registered Under Indian Companies Act, 1956) Having Its Registered Office At F- 47 Malviya Industrial Area, Jaipur. Through Its Director Smt. Manju Garg Wife Of Late Shri Bhimsen Garg, Aged About 68 Years, Resident Of B-98, Gyan Marg, Tilak Nagar, Jaipur (Rajasthan) ----Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through The Secretary, Revenue Department, Government Of Rajasthan, Jaipur. 2. The Secretary, Urban Development And Housing Department, Government Of Rajasthan, Jaipur. 3. The Superintendent Of Police, Jaipur Mahanagar, Jaipur Rajasthan. 4. The Station House Officer (Sho), Police Station Adrash Nagar, Jaipur East, Jaipur, Rajasthan. 5. Shri Kewal Krishan Jindal Son Of Shri Vilayati Ram Ji, M/s. Vilayati Ram Ashok Kumar Jindal, Lakkad Mandi, Gaushala Road, Sri Ganganagar, Rajasthan. 6. Shri Tarsem Jindal Son Of Shri Vilayati Ram Ji, M/s. Vilayati Ram Ashok Kumar Jindal, Lakkad Mandi,gaushala Road, Sri Ganganagar, Rajasthan. 7. Shri Gauri Shankar Jindal Son Of Shri Vilayati Ram Ji, Resident Of House No. 35, P-Block, Sri Ganganagar, Rajasthan. 8. Shri Ashok Kumar Jindal Son Of Shri Vilayati Ram, Resident Of 4-A-11, Jawahar Nagar, Sri Ganganagar, Rajasthan. 9. Shri Vijaya Kumar Son Of Shri Atma Ram, Resident Of 6- J-32, Jawahar Nagar, Sri Ganganagar, Rajasthan. 10. Shri Ramesh Kumar Malpani Son Of Shri Harak Chand, Resident Of House No. 20, C-Block, Sri Ganganagar, Rajasthan. ----Respondents [2025:RJ-JP:17600] (2 of 2) [CW-6079/2025] For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vinodi Lal Mathur Mr. Amit Kumar Dhawan JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND Order 25/04/2025 1. Several reliefs have been claimed by the petitioner by way of filing this writ petition. 2. So far as relief No.1 is concerned, the petitioner can file criminal writ petition seeking redresal of his grievances, but so far other reliefs are concerned, the writ petition is not maintainable as the relief sought for cannot be granted by this Court in its writ jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. 3. Accordingly, the writ petition stands dismissed. Stay application as well as all applications (pending, if any) also stand dismissed. 4. However, the petitioner would be at liberty to approach the appropriate forum of law for redressal of his grievances. (ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J Karan/13