Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 14973 (JHR)

Nivedita Kumari v. Social Welfare Women And Child Development Dept

WPC/3689/2016 · 2025-04-24

Deepak Roshan

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:JHHC:12389 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(S) No. 3689 of 2016 Nivedita kumari, D/o- Sri Chhatradhari Prasad Singh. Resident of Plot No- 33 Veer Kunwar Singh Colony Air Port Road P.O-Hinoo, P.S- Doranda Ranchi-2. ... … Petitioner(s) Versus (1)_ The State of Jharkhand (2) The Secretary Women, Child Development & Social Security Department, govt of Jharkhand, Project Building, P.O & P.O- Dhurwa, Ranchi. (3) Jharkhand State Commission for Women, Engineers Hostel near Gol Chakkar P.O & P.S- Dhurwa, Ranchi. (4) The Chairperson, the Jharkhand State Commission for Women, Engineers Hotel, Near Gol Chakkar, P.O & P.S- Dhurwa, Dist- Ranchi. (5) Dr. Mahua Maji, Chairperson, the Jharkhand State Commission for Women, Engineers Hotel, Near Gol Chakkar, P.O & P.S- Dhurwa, Dist- Ranchi. (6) Chandrasekhar Jha the under secretary, the Jharkhand State Commission for Women, Engineers Hotel Near Gol Chakkar, P.O & P.S- Dhurwa, Dist- Ranchi. (7) Rashmi Kumari, Computer operator. The Jharkhand State Commission for Women Engineers Hotel Near Gol Chakkar, PO & P.S- Dhurwa, Dist Ranchi. … … Respondent(s) CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. Indrajit Sinha, Advocate Mr. Arpan Mishra, Advocate For the Respondent-State : Ms. Sunita Kumari, AC to Sr. SC-II -------- Order No. 15/Dated: 24th April 2025 The instant writ application has been preferred by the petitioner for quashing the letter dated 25.04.2016 whereby the petitioner has been terminated from the service as she was working as Personal Assistant on contract basis. 2. After going through the termination order, it appears that on the one hand the termination order is not stigmatic order and on the other hand the work was totally contractual in nature as such, no relief can be granted to the petitioner. 3. In view of the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, the instant writ application is dismissed. (Deepak Roshan, J.) Amit