B S N V SATYANARAYANA v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
CRLP/4003/2025 · 2025-04-16
Harinath N
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 14972 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 14972 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010188512025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] WEDNESDAY ,THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 4003/2025 Between: B S N V Satyanarayana ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED AND The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner/accused:
1. P SARASWATHI Counsel for the Respondent/complainant(S):
1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR The Court made the following:
2 CRL.P. No.4003 of 2025
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N CRIMINAL PETITION No.4003 OF 2025 ORDER:
1. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Assistant Public Prosecutor appearing for the State.
2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has filed a Memo in C.C. No.1723 of 2019 on the file of the Court of First Additional Junior Civil Judge, Kakinada, seeking the cancellation of the chief examination on the ground of impersonation of P.W.2 and for initiation of legal proceedings under the provisions of the Indian Penal Code and the Code of Criminal Procedure.
3. It is further submitted that the said Memo has not even received by the court, and the Court has declined to assign SR number to the said Memo. The grievance of the petitioner arises from the fact that PW2, during her cross-examination, stated her surname, which revealed discrepancies in the surname when compared to the details on her Aadhaar Card. Based on these grounds, the petitioner filed the Memo before the First Additional Judicial Magistrate of First Class. The said memo was not taken on record.
4. Filing such memorandums seeking prayers of this nature aligns with the principles of criminal jurisprudence. However, the petitioner has an effective alternative remedy, which the petitioner should ideally invoke.
3 CRL.P. No.4003 of 2025
5. With these observations, the criminal petition is dismissed.
6. Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this criminal petition shall stand closed. ____________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N Dt.16.04.2025 BV