Kaliuri Shakil Babu, v. The State of Andhra Pradesh,
CRLP/3975/2025 · 2025-04-10
Harinath N
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 14970 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 14970 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
ft IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI THURSDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 3975 OF 2025 Between: Kaliuri Shakil Babu, S/o. Late K.Babji, aged about 43 years. Occ Private Employee, R/o D No.7-29, SBI Street, Near Cross Roads Kalikiri Town and Mandal. Annamayya District Erstwhile Chittoor District, Presently working as Lab Technician at Dr.AL Jamal Medical Center, Mahaboola, Kuwait ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED(S) AND
1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Public Prosecutor, High Court at Amaravati, through the Station House Officer Kalikiri Police Station, Annamayya District. 2. The Consular Embassy of India, Kuwait. ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANTS Petition under section 482 of Cr.P.C and new section 528 of BNSS, 2023, praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court pleased to quash the order passed in Crl.M.P.No.161 of 2025 in C.C.No.143 of 2024 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Vayalapad, Chittoor District dated 04.04.2025 and allow the said petition. y i.A. NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under section 482 of Cr.P.C and new section 528 of BNSS, 2023pray4ng that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to order issuance of renewal of passport to the petitioner to enable him to visit abroad to get his VISA renewed, pending disposal of the criminal petition r This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri K Narsi Reddy ,Advocate for the Petitioner and the Public Prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent No.1 and None Appeared for the Respondent No. 2. The Court made the following:
APHC010188352025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATl (Special Original Jurisdiction) 0M0 [3457] 0Sfr5 THURSDAY ,THE TENTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 3975/2025 Between: ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED Kaliuri Shakil Babu, AND ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT(S) The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others Counsel for the Petitioner/accused:
1.KNARSI REDDY Counsel for the Respondent/complainant(S):
1.PUBLIC PROSECUTOR The Court made the following Order: Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Assistant Public Prosecutor appearing for the State. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner
2.
has filed Crl.M.P.No.161 of 2025 in C.C.No.143 of 2024 seeking a direction nd from the Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Vayalpad, for a direction to the 2 respondent therein to renew the passport of the petitioner. The learned Magistrate has dismissed the petition vide order dated 04.04.2025. f 2 % The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the passport of
3. the petitioner will expire on 10.06,2025 and that he is required to travel abroad on job. On account of pendency of the case, the learned Magistrate has denied renewal of his passport. The Hon’ble Supreme Court in the matter on Vangala Kasturi Rangacharyulu vs. CBl\
directed the passport authority to renew the
4. passport and also held that passport authority cannot refuse renewal of passport on ground of the pendency of criminal case. The Hon’ble High Court for the State of Telangana in the matter of Venkata Siva Kumar Yadhanapudi vs. The Union of India and another^,
5. considered the similar issue and referred to various judgments passed by the Hon’ble Supreme Court, directed the passport authority to renew the passport of the petitioner. The Hon’ble High Court for the State of Telangana in the matter of Arihant Prakash Katariya vs. The State of Telangana and others^, also dealt with similar issue and
directed the passport authority to renew the
6. passport of the petitioner. Considering the same, the concerned passport authority is
7.
directed to renew the passport of the petitioner for the period of ten (10) years as done in all the cases, subject to the application of the petitioner being in
order. Further, the petitioner shall comply with the directions of the learned Magistrate for undertaking any travel. ^ Criminal Appeal No.1342 of 2017 ^W.P.No.2802 of 2024 ^ W.P.No.7450 of 2025
\ f 3 Accordingly, the Criminal Petition is disposed of. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall
8.
9. r stand closed.
Sd/- A.VIJAYA BABU ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SE^ON OFFICER To
1. The Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Vayalapad, Chittoor District. The Station House Officer Kalikiri Police Station, Annamayya District. The Consular Embassy of India, Kuwait. One CC to Sri. K Narsi Reddy, Advocate [OPUC] Two CCs to Public Prosecutor, High Court of Andhra Pradesh [OUT Two CD Copies
2.
3.
4.
5.
6. PR RAM
HIGH COURT DATED:10/04/2025
ORDER f* UAPR™® » OgSPATC>3>^ CRLP.No.3975 of 2025 DISPOSING THE CRLP