Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 149623 (ALL)

VANDANA AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME DEPTT. LKO AND 3 OTHERS

CRLP/6061/2025 · 2025-07-10

Manish Kumar, Vivek Chaudhary

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:39223-DB Court No. - 10 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 6061 of 2025 Petitioner :- Vandana And Another Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ajay Madhavan Counsel for Respondent :- G.A. Hon'ble Vivek Chaudhary,J. Hon'ble Manish Kumar,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned A.G.A. for the State-respondents and perused the material available on record. 2. This petition seeks issuance of a writ of Mandamus, commanding the respondents not to disturb the peaceful married life of petitioners and further not to harass the family members of petitioner no.2 and to protect the life and liberty of the petitioners. 3. Learned A.G.A., on instructions, states that the F.I.R. in this case has been lodged. A copy of the F.I.R. has also been provided to counsel for the petitioners. 4. In view thereof, learned counsel for the petitioners prays to withdraw the present writ petition with liberty to file a fresh petition challenging the F.I.R.. 5. With the aforesaid liberty, the present writ petition is consigned to record as withdrawn. (Manish Kumar, J.) (Vivek Chaudhary, J.) Order Date :- 10.7.2025 Praveen Digitally signed by :- PRAVEEN KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench