RAMBHA SINGH v. UTTARAKHAND POWER CORPORATION LIMITED
WPMS/3673/2025 · 2025-12-30
Ravindra Maithani
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 14961 (UTT) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 14961 (UTT) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
58SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS
Correction Application, MCRC No.2 of 2026 In WPMS No.3673 of 2025 Hon’ble Ravindra Maithani, J. Mr. Rishabh Bisht, Advocate for the petitioner. Heard. The instant writ petition was decided on
30.12.2025. Now, the correction application has been filed that in Para 6 of the judgment, in the last sentence, instead of respondent no.1, respondent no.2 has been typed. The correction application is allowed. This clerical mistake is corrected and in the last sentence of the order dated 30.12.2025, in Para 6, the Figure ‘2’ be replaced by figure ‘1’.
The Correction Application is allowed.
The order dated 30.12.2025 shall be read accordingly.
(Ravindra Maithani J.)
09.01.2026 RV