ZISHAN KHAN v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. DEPTT. OF HOME LKO. AND OTHERS
CRLP/6013/2025 · 2025-07-09
Brij Raj Singh, Sangeeta Chandra
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 149594 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 149594 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:38895-DB Court No. - 9 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 6013 of 2025 Petitioner :- Zishan Khan Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. Of Home Lko. And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Sachin Pandey Counsel for Respondent :- G.A. Hon'ble Mrs. Sangeeta Chandra,J. Hon'ble Brij Raj Singh,J.
1. 'Vakalatnama' filed by Shri Aviral Srivastava Advocate on behalf of the private informant is taken on record.
2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned A.G.A. who appears for the State-respondents, learned counsel for the private respondent and perused the record.
3. The instant writ petition has been filed with the following prayers:
"a writ, an order or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing the impugned Case Crime No./F.I.R. No. 0165/2024, under Sections 419, 420, 406, 504 and 506 I.P.C. dated
29.06.2024. Police Station Baldirai, District Sultanpur on the basis of compromise deed dated 19.06.2025, contained as Annexure NO. 01 to this writ petition."
4. It has been submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that after lodging of the F.I.R. a compromise has occurred between the petitioner and the informant. Sri Aviral Srivastava, who has filed his Power on behalf of the informant, does not dispute the contention raised by the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner.
5. Learned A.G.A. has produced before this Court the instructions sent by Mohal Lal Rana-Sub Inspector, Police Station-Baldirai, District-Sultanpur wherein it has been stated that after investigation charge-sheet has been issued against Zishan Khan, Naushad and Azhar on 30.03.2025 on 30.03.2025 and has also been filed in court on 02.07.2025. The Instructions are taken on record.
6. Since sufficient evidence has been collected, no interference is warranted by this Court.
7. The writ petition is, accordingly, dismissed.
8. Registry is directed to return the original copy of the compromise to the petitioners after retaining a photostat copy of the same on record. (Brij Raj Singh,J.) (Sangeeta Chandra,J.) Order Date :- 9.7.2025 Arvind Digitally signed by :- ARVIND KUMAR SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench