NANHE LAL v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. AND ANOTHER
ABAIL/798/2025 · 2025-07-22
Karunesh Singh Pawar
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 149584 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 149584 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:41988 Court No. - 14 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 798 of 2025 Applicant :- Nanhe Lal Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Anand Prakash Pandey,Dr.Surya Prakash Mishra Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Karunesh Singh Pawar,J. The present anticipatory bail application has been filed by the applicants their arrest in CASE CRIME NO. 0062/2024, U/S 323, 325, 452, 504 I.P.C., POLICE STATION- BHITI, DISTRICT-AMBEDKAR NAGAR Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State. Learned AGA has raised a preliminary objection, stating that the charge sheet has already been filed in the case, the alleged offences are punishable with imprisonment of up to seven years, and there is no apprehension of the applicant's arrest. Perused the record. From perusal of the record, it appears that there are allegations against the applicant and other accused of assaulting the injured, Sursati Devi, who sustained a fracture in the tibia bone of her left leg. There is nothing on record to suggest that the FIR has been lodged with the intent to falsely implicate or malign the applicant’s reputation. Furthermore, there is no apprehension of arrest at this stage.. In view of the above, no ground for grant of anticipatory bail is made out. Accordingly, the anticipatory bail application stands rejected.
However, it is provided that if a regular bail application is filed within ten days from the date of receipt of the certified copy of this order, the same shall be considered and decided in accordance with the law laid down by the Hon’ble Supreme Court inSpecial Leave to Appeal (Cri) No.5191 of 2021
"Satender Kumar Antil versus Central Bureau of Investigation and another". Order Date :- 22.7.2025 R.C. Digitally signed by :- RAM CHANDER YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench