Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010149352024 2025:GAU-AS:11016 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No.: WP(C)/3697/2023 M/S DEVI ENGINEERING AND CONSTRUCTIONS PRIVATE LTD. NARASANNA NAGAR DIST. EAST GODAVARI 69-7-2 FLAT NO. G1 IVY GRAND APARTMENTS KAKINADA ANDHRA PRADESH-533005 REPRESENTED BY ITS SENIOR MANAGER (PROJECTS) SHRI SAINENI VENKATA RAMESH CHANDRA SON OF LATE PULLA RAO R/O- 2-2-238/G JANAPRIYA NAGAR MIYAPUR HYDERABAD-500048. VERSUS OIL INDIA LIMITED (OIL) AND ANR P.O. DULIAJAN DIST. DIBRUGARH PIN- 786602 REPRESENTED BY ITS CHIEF RESIDENCE EXECUTIVE. 2:CHIEF GENERAL MANAGER- CONTRACTS (HoD) P.O. DULIAJAN DIST. DIBRUGARH PIN- 786602. Page No.# 2/2 For the petitioner (s) : Mr. K. N. Choudhury, Sr. Advocate Ms. R. Deka, Advocate For the respondent (s) : MR. K. Kalita, SC, OIL BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEVASHIS BARUAH O R D E R 19.08.2025 Heard Mr. K. N. Choudhury, the learned senior counsel assisted by Ms. R. Deka, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and Mr. K. Kalita, the learned Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of the OIL. 2. Mr. K. N. Choudhury, the learned senior counsel for the petitioner submits that taking into account the materials on record, the petitioner would be well advised to take recourse to the Arbitration Clause in view of the limited scope of jurisdiction in a proceedings under Article 226 of the Constitution. 3. Taking into account the above submission, the instant writ petition therefore stands closed on withdrawal without prejudice to the petitioner to invoke the Arbitration Clause, if so advised. JUDGE Comparing Assistant