APHC010188552019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH THURSDAY ,THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: Between: Karyamsetty Prem Kumari, and Others The State Of Ap and Others Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. D VENKATA RAMANA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR MEDICAL HEALTH FW(AP) The Court made the following: ORDER:- The instant Writ Petition is filed India for the following relief: “to issue a Writ of Mandamus respondents to Release the death benefits Karyamsetty Kantha Rao to the petitioners herein, which was granted as per decretal order dated 25.08.2008 in S.O.P.No.20 of 2002 orders”. IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY ,THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 8166 OF 2019 Karyamsetty Prem Kumari, and Others ...PETITIONER(S) AND The State Of Ap and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner(S): D VENKATA RAMANA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): GP FOR MEDICAL HEALTH FW(AP) Court made the following: Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the following relief: to issue a Writ of Mandamus declaring that the failure of the respondents to Release the death benefits arrears and pension of late Karyamsetty Kantha Rao to the petitioners herein, which was granted as per decretal order dated 25.08.2008 in S.O.P.No.20 of 2002 and pass such other IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH [3396] THURSDAY ,THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF MARCH THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA ...PETITIONER(S) ...RESPONDENT(S) under Article 226 of the Constitution of that the failure of the arrears and pension of late Karyamsetty Kantha Rao to the petitioners herein, which was granted as per and pass such other 2. Heard Sri D.Venkata Ramana Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Assistant Government Pleader for Medical Health and Family Welfare for the respondents. 3. Learned counsel for the Petitioner would submit that no further orders are required to be passed in this Writ Petition and that petition may be disposed of. 4. Considering the submissions made, the Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 13.03.2025 KK