Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 149536 (ALL)

HANSRAM AND ANOTHER v. ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER, JUDICIAL IST, LUCKNOW MANDAL, LUCKNOW AND 19 OTHERS

A227/3986/2025 · 2025-07-08

Alok Mathur

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:38708 Court No. - 6 Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 3986 of 2025 Petitioner :- Hansram And Another Respondent :- Additional Commissioner, Judicial Ist, Lucknow Mandal, Lucknow And 19 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Vipin Kumar Mishra Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Alok Mathur,J. 1. Heard Sri Vipin Kumar Mishra, learned counsel for petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel for the State. 2. In light of the proposed order, notices to private respondents are dispensed with. 3. It has been submitted by learned counsel for petitioners that the dispute in the present case case pertains to land situated at Gata No. 94 Aa/0.087, 94 b/1.770, 95/0.013, 96/0.016, 101/0.206 hectare situated at Village - Ayaspur Dihi, Pargana & Tehsil Sadar, District - Raebareli wherein the application of the petitioners U/S 229 B of U.P.Z.A. & L.R. Act was allowed by Sub-Divisional Magistrate (Judicial), Tehsil Raebareli, District - Raebareli after giving adequate opportunity of hearing to all the parties by order dated 15.02.2025. 4. It has been submitted that being aggrieved by the order dated 15.02.2025 has filed an appeal before the Additional Commissioner (Judicial-I), Lucknow Mandal, Lucknow registered as Case No. 888/2025, Computerized Case No. C202510000000888 U/s 331(3) of U.P.Z.A. & L.R. Act which is pending consideration. 5. The grievance raised by the petitioners in the present case is that despite an order of status quo having been passed by respondent No. 1, respondent No. 3 is interfering in the possession of the petitioners. 6. Learned Standing Counsel does not dispute the aforesaid facts and submits that all these facts can be raised before the appellate court who is fully entitled to pass appropriate order regarding the allegation raised by the petitioner in the present case. Accordingly, liberty is granted to the petitioners to raise all these facts by moving application application before respondent No. 1 who shall look into the matter and pass appropriate orders with expedition, say, within a period of two weeks from the application is made. 7. With the above observations / directions, the writ petition stands disposed of. (Alok Mathur, J.) Order Date :- 8.7.2025 Ravi/ Digitally signed by :- RAVI SHANKAR SRIVASTAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench