ANIL YADAV AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO.A ND 2 OTHERS
CRLP/5942/2025 · 2025-07-21
Sangeeta Chandra, Subhash Vidyarthi
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 149535 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 149535 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:41672-DB Court No. - 9 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 5942 of 2025 Petitioner :- Anil Yadav And Another Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko.A Nd 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Pradeep Kumar Shukla Counsel for Respondent :- G.A. Hon'ble Mrs. Sangeeta Chandra,J. Hon'ble Subhash Vidyarthi,J.
1. In pursuance of the order dated 09.07.2025 the opposite party no. 3 has appeared in person. His counsel Sri Gopal Ji Shukla, Advocate has filed his vakalatnama. It has been informed by the opposite party no. 3 on a specific query being made that he had paid Rs. 5 lakh for purchase of land: 2.5 lakh was paid through RTGS in the account of one Keshav Ram and Rs. 2.5 lakh was given as cash to the petitioners Anil Yadav and Sunil Yadav, both are sons of Ram Kishun. It has been submitted by the opposite party no. 3 that only Rs. 2 lakh has been returned by Keshav Ram in the account of the opposite party no.
3. Rs. 2.5 lakh which was given in cash to the petitionersh as not been returned by them. They are disowning their liability. He is not ready to amicably settle the dispute through mediation.
2. We have gone through the contents of the FIR and also the pleadings on record, there is no admission of the petitioners of having received of Rs. 2.5 lakh in cash from the respondent no. 3. They have only stated that they were facilitating the sale of property of one Keshav Ram and they had no concern with the dispute and that Keshav Ram had returned Rs. 2 lakh through RTGS on 17.04.2025 to the informant.
3. From a perusal of the FIR a cognizable offence is made out.
4. We do not find any good ground to show interference.
5. The writ petition is dismissed. Interim order, if any, is discharged. . (Subhash Vidyarthi, J.) (Sangeeta Chandara, J.) Order Date :- 21.7.2025 Pradeep/- Digitally signed by :- PRADEEP SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- PRADEEP SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench