Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:38492 Court No. - 6 Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 3997 of 2025 Petitioner :- Smt. Kanak Lata And 2 Others Respondent :- Tehsildar Milkypur Ayodhya Distt. Ayodhya And Another Counsel for Petitioner :- Ganga Prasad Mishra,Abhinav Mishra,Gaurav Chandra Kashyap Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Alok Mathur,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents. 2. In view of the order proposed to be passed, requirement of issuance of notice to private respondents are hereby dispensed with. 3. Instant petition has been filed by the petitioners praying for direction to the respondent No. 1/Tehsildar, Milkypur, Ayodhya District Ayodhya to decide Case No. 01810/2019 (Computerized Case No. T201904230401810) U/S 34 of U.P,. Revenue Code, 2006 (Smt. Kanaklata Vs. Umashankar) expeditiously. 4. After arguing the matter at some length, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that grievance of the petition would be sufficiently met in case respondent No. 2/Sub Divisional Officer, Tehsil Fatehpur District Barabanki , considers and decides the aforesaid case in the time bound manner. 5. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection to the aforesaid prayer. However, he submits that in that case restoration application dated 30.04.2025 is pending. 6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without entering into the merits, respondent No. 2/Sub Divisional Officer, Tehsil Fatehpur District Barabanki, is directed to decide pending restoration application dated 30.04.2025 in Case No. 01810/2019 (Computerized Case No. T201904230401810) U/S 34 of U.P,. Revenue Code, 2006 (Smt. Kanaklata Vs. Umashankar) expeditiously, say , within a period of four weeks from the date of production of certified copy of this order, in accordance with law, if there is no legal impediment. 7. It is further provided that in case the aforesaid restoration application dated 30.04.2025 is decided in favour of petitioner, the petitioner is at liberty to move an application for expediting the Case No. 01810/2019 (Computerized Case No. T201904230401810) U/S 34 of U.P,. Revenue Code, 2006 (Smt. Kanaklata Vs. Umashankar). 8. It is further directed that the parties to the case shall cooperate in expeditious disposal of the case and shall not seek any unnecessary adjournment, neither any such adjournment shall be granted by the Court concerned, except in exceptional circumstances. 9. With above observations/directions, the writ petition stands disposed of. (Alok Mathur, J.) Order Date :- 8.7.2025 Ravi/ Digitally signed by :- RAVI SHANKAR SRIVASTAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench