1 2025:CGHC:14356 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRA No. 769 of 2023 Pintu Kumar Kache S/o Tirath Prasad Kache Aged About 31 Years R/o Mangawan, Ward No. 04, P.S. Mangawan, District Riwa (M.P.) At Present R/o Vandana Global, Labour Quarter No. 3 Of Company, P.S. Dharsiwa, District Raipur (C.G.) ... Appellant versus State of Chhattisgarh Through Station House OfÏcer, Police Station Dharsiwa District Raipur (C.G.) ... Respondent For Appellant : Mr. Rekhraj Baghel, Advocate. For Respondent/State : Ms. Smriti Shrivastava, Panel Lawyer. Hon'ble Mr. Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Order on Board 25 / 03 /202 5 1. Though, today the present appeal has been listed for hearing on I.A. No.1 of 2023, which is an application for suspension of sentence and grant of bail, however with the consent of learned counsel for the parties and considering the period of detention of the appellant, the appeal is heard finally. 2. Accordingly, I.A. No.01 of 2023 stands disposed of. RAHUL DEWANGAN Digitally signed by RAHUL DEWANGAN 2 3. This appeal is directed against the judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 29.03.2023 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge (Special Judge of Special Court for trial of C.B.I. cases), Raipur, District – Raipur (C.G.) in S.T. No. 306/2021, whereby the appellant has been convicted and sentenced in following manner :- CONVICTION SENTENCE Under Section 304 Part-I of the Indian Penal Code RI for 04 years and fine of Rs.500/-, in default of payment of fine to further undergo SI for 03 months. The appellant has deposited the fine amount which is imposed by the learned trial Court. 4. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that the appellant has already served out the jail sentence awarded by the learned trial Court i.e. RI for 04 years under Section 304 Part-I of the Indian Penal Code, as there is also a report of office of the Superintendent, Central Jail, Raipur, District – Raipur (C.G.) dated 24.03.2025, which shows that the appellant has already served out the jail sentence and has been released from jail, therefore, he does not want to press this appeal on merits. 3 5. In view of the aforesaid submission made by learned counsel for the appellant that he does not want to press the appeal further on merits. Accordingly, the present appeal is dismissed. Sd/- (Ramesh Sinha) Chief Justice Rahul Dewangan