Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 149404 (ALL)

MR. AMIT CHAUHAN AND OTHERS v. MRS. PRACHI SINGH AND OTHERS

CRLP/6006/2025 · 2025-07-09

Brij Raj Singh, Sangeeta Chandra

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:38966-DB Court No. - 9 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 6006 of 2025 Petitioner :- Mr. Amit Chauhan And Others Respondent :- Mrs. Prachi Singh And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Skand Bajpai,Pradeep Kumar Shukla Counsel for Respondent :- G.A. Hon'ble Mrs. Sangeeta Chandra,J. Hon'ble Brij Raj Singh,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned A.G.A. who appears for the State-respondents and perused the record. 2. The instant writ petition has been filed with the following prayer: "allow this petition and pass an order(s) or direction(s) in the nature of writ of certiorari quashing the First Information Report No. 0046 of 2025 dated 08.03.2025 registered at police station Gomti Nagar Extention, Lucknow under SEctions 498- A, 504, 323 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 and Section 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 (Annexure- 1) from page 19 to 38." 3. It has been submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that the informant was married to the petitioner No.1-Amit Chauhan way back in the year 2009 and it is apparent from the perusal of the F.I.R that he has been instigated into lodging the same by some family members for some extraneous consideration. 4. Learned A.G.A., on the basis of written instructions, which has been sent by the Investigating Officer-Lavlesh Kumar, Sub- Inspector of Police Station Gomti Nagar Vistar, District Lucknow Hanswar, District Ambedkar Nagar, states that the investigation has been completed. The said instructions is taken on record. 5. Learned A.G.A.on the basis of instructions received by him telephonically also says that the charge-sheet has been prepared and submitted to the supervisory authority on 20.06.2025. 6. Sufficient incriminating evidence has been filed against the petitioners and charge-sheet has been prepared. Nevertheless we have gone through the contents of the F.I.R. and we find from the same that the opposite party No.1 has mentioned that she has faced torture through her in-laws, a cognizable offence is made out. 7. This Court cannot interfere at this stage and grant the relief as prayed for. 8. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed. (Brij Raj Singh,J.) (Sangeeta Chandra,J.) Order Date :- 9.7.2025 Arvind Digitally signed by :- ARVIND KUMAR SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench