Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 14940 (RAJ)

HEMRAJ S/O KISHAN LAL v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN

WRES/573/2024 · 2025-01-21

Sudesh Bansal

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:2932] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Writ Restoration Application No. 573/2024 In S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.5655/2018 1. Hemraj S/o Kishan Lal, Aged About 53 Years, R/o Colony Bajrangpura Area Saketpura Near Marmat Kirana Store, Kota (Raj). 2. Abdul Mazid S/o Abdul Hamid, Aged About 55 Years, R/o Ward No. 17, Near Kishan Sandesh Printing Press Ladpura, Kota (Raj). ----Petitioners Versus 1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Chief Secretary, Secretariat Jaipur. 2. Director, Directorate Of Local Bodies, Near 22, Godawn Jaipur Rajasthan. 3. Municipal Corporation, Kota Through Its Administrator Kota, Rajasthan. All Are Resident Of Ward No. 12, Mohalla Jamidaran, Sikar Tehsil And District Sikar (Raj). ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Yogesh Pujari For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDESH BANSAL Order 21/01/2025 1. Instant restoration application has been filed by petitioners, seeking restoration of S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.5655/2018, which came to be dismissed due to non-compliance of peremptory order dated 01.03.2024. 2. Counsel for applicant states that requisite PF & notices were filed, however, due to bonafide error, extra PB sets could not have [2025:RJ-JP:2932] (2 of 2) [WRES-573/2024] been filed. Counsel undertakes to file requisite PB sets soon after restoration of the writ petition. 3. Taking into consideration the reasons mentioned in the application and undertaking of counsel for applicant to file requisite PB sets, this Court deems it just and proper to allow the instant application. 4. Accordingly, the instant restoration application is allowed and S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.5655/2018 is allowed to be restored to its original number. (SUDESH BANSAL),J Sachin/37