DAKSHIN HARYANA BIJLI VITRAN NIGAM v. RAJ RANI KAPOOR AND ANOTHER
CWP/1626/2024 · 2025-07-31
Suvir Sehgal
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 14940 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 14940 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 237+104 CWP-1626-2024 (O & M) Date of Decision:31.07.2025 DAKSHIN HARYANA BIJLI VITRAN NIGAM ...PETITIONER VERSUS RAJ RANI KAPOOR AND ANOTHER ...RESPONDENTS CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUVIR SEHGAL Present: Mr. Anil Chawla, Advocate and Ms. Monica Chawla, Advocate for the petitioner. Service of respondent No.2 was ordered to be dispensed with by this Court vide order dated 12.12.2024. *** SUVIR SEHGAL, J.(ORAL) CM-10855-CWP-2025 & CM-10856-CWP-2025
1. For the reasons given in the applications, they are allowed.
2. Legal representatives of the deceased/respondent No.1 are ordered to be impleaded in place of the deceased, subject to all just exceptions.
3. Amended memo of parties is taken on record. Main Case
4. Counsel for the petitioner has placed on record a xerox copy of Memo No.13701 dated 23.07.2025 to submit that in view of a settlement arrived at between the parties, he has instructions to withdraw the writ petition.
5. Dismissed as withdrawn. 31.07.2025 (SUVIR SEHGAL) sheetal
JUDGE Whether Speaking/Reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No Sheetal 2025.08.02 13:37 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment High Court, Chandigarh