SANJAY KUMAR SINGH v. SRI SURYA PAL GANGWAR, D.M., LKO.
CAPL/2163/2023 · 2025-03-26
Rajeev Singh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 149391 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 149391 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:17376 Court No. - 17 Case :- CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 2163 of 2023 Applicant :- Sanjay Kumar Singh Opposite Party :- Sri Surya Pal Gangwar, D.M., Lko. Counsel for Applicant :- Amit Kumar Pathak,Ganesh Kumar Gupta Hon'ble Rajeev Singh,J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and the learned Standing Counsel for State.
2. The present contempt application is filed with the following prayer :
"This Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to summon the contemnors/opposite parties in person before this Hon'ble Court for his willfully and deliberately disobedience of the order dated 24.03.2023 passed by the Hon'ble High Court in Writ Petition No.2007 of 2023 (WRIC) (Sanjay Kumar Singh Vs. State of U.P. and others) under Article 226 of the Constitution of India and also punish them under the Contempt of Court Act, 1971 in the interest of justice."
3. Sri Vinayak Saxena, learned Standing Counsel, placed before this Court written instructions duly signed by District Magistrate, Lucknow dated 26.08.2023, which is taken on record. Learned Standing Counsel informed the Court that in pursuance of the recovery certificate issued by Uttar Pradesh Real Estate Regulatory Authority at Lucknow (RERA), the recovery amount of Rs.13,52,928/- along with interest, the total of which comes to Rs.14,34,344/-, has been recovered and the same has been forwarded to RERA vide cheque no.807578 dated 26.08.2023. He further submitted that now no recovery certificate is pending before the District Magistrate, Lucknow.
4. Considering the contents of the written instructions placed by Sri Vinayak Saxena, learned Standing Counsel, no case for contempt is made out against the respondent.
5. Accordingly, the contempt application is dismissed. However, it is open to the applicant to take appropriate remedy, if he still feels aggrieved. Order Date :- 26.3.2025. Rks. Digitally signed by :- RAJESH KUMAR SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench