Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 14939 (RAJ)

LEELABAI W/O DULE SINGH v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/4923/2025 · 2025-06-19

Maneesh Sharma V J

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:23350] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 4923/2025 1. Leelabai W/o Dule Singh, Aged About 70 Years, R/o Guradiya Devda, Police Station Unhel, District Jhalawar (Rajasthan) (At Present Confined In Sub Jail Bhawanimandi) 2. Dule Singh S/o Kacharu Singh, Aged About 75 Years, R/o Guradiya Devda, Police Station Unhel, District Jhalawar (Rajasthan) (At Present Confined In Sub Jail Bhawanimandi) ----Petitioners Versus State of Rajasthan through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ajay Singh Yaduvanshi For Respondent(s) For Complainant(s) : : : Mr. Rajesh Choudhary GA-cum-AAG Mr. Vinod Sharma Mr. Prakash Chand Yadav HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANEESH SHARMA (V. J.) Order 19/06/2025 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (B.N.S.S.) on behalf of the petitioners. The petitioners have been arrested in connection with FIR No.25/2025 registered at Police Station Gangdhar, District Jhalawar for the offence(s) under Sections 420, 406, 419, 468 and 471 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 (I.P.C.). 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have falsely been implicated in this case. He submits that the petitioner No.1 is a bona fide purchaser of the disputed land vide registered sale deed on 22.07.2010 and the FIR was registered after delay of 14 years. He further submits that the allegation of forgery is against the co-accused Sodanlal, and the other co-accused Dasrath Singh has since passed away. He further submits that the charge-sheet has already been filed in this matter and the offences are triable by Magistrate. The petitioners are in judicial custody since 20.03.2025 and trial of the case may [2025:RJ-JP:23350] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-4923/2025] take considerable time, therefore, the bail application of the petitioners may be allowed. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor as well as learned counsel for the complainant vehemently oppose the bail application. 4. Heard and perused the material available on record. 5. Considering the fact that the petitioner No.1 is a bona fide purchaser of the disputed land vide registered sale deed on 22.07.2010; the FIR was registered after delay of 14 years; the allegation of forgery is against the co-accused Sodanlal, and the other co-accused Dasrath Singh has since passed away; also considering the fact that the charge-sheet has already been filed in this matter and the offences are triable by Magistrate; the petitioners are in judicial custody since 20.03.2025; and the trial of the case may take considerable time, therefore, without commenting any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case, I deem it just and proper to enlarge the petitioners on bail. 6. Accordingly, the bail application filed under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioners- (1) Leelabai W/o Dule Singh (2) Dule Singh S/o Kacharu Singh shall be enlarged on bail provided both of them furnish a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lac Only) with two sureties of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand Only) each to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court for their appearance before the court concerned on all the dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. (MANEESH SHARMA (V. J.)),J DEEPA RANI-12