HARAS NAGPAL v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. REVENUE DEPTT. LKO. AND 2 OTHERS
A227/3937/2025 · 2025-07-04
Alok Mathur
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 149310 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 149310 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:38008 Court No. - 6 Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 3937 of 2025 Petitioner :- Haras Nagpal Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue Deptt. Lko. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Sanjeev Dwivedi Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Alok Mathur,J.
1. Heard Sri Sanjeev Dwivedi, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents.
2. In view of the order proposed to be passed, requirement of issuance of notice to respondents is hereby dispensed with.
3. Instant petition has been filed by the petitioner praying for direction to the respondent No. 2/Chairman, Rajasva Parishad (Board of Revenue), Lucknow, U.P. to decide the Appeal No. SA / 1983/2021 Computerized Case NO. R20210960001983 (Parashuram Vs. State of U.P. & others), expeditiously.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that grievance of the petition would be sufficiently met in case respondent No. 2/Chairman, Rajasva Parishad (Board of Revenue), Lucknow, U.P., considers and decides the aforesaid case in the time bound manner.
5. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection to the aforesaid prayer.
6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without entering into the merits, respondent No. 2/Chairman, Rajasva Parishad (Board of Revenue), Lucknow, U.P., is directed to decide Appeal No. SA / 1983/2021 Computerized Case No. R20210960001983 (Parashuram Vs. State of U.P. & others), expeditiously, say within a period of six months from the date of production of certified copy of this order, in accordance with law, if there is no legal impediment.
7. It is further directed that the parties to the case shall cooperate in expeditious disposal of the case and shall not seek any unnecessary adjournment, neither any such adjournment shall be granted by the Court concerned, except in exceptional circumstances.
8. With above observations/directions, the writ petition stands
disposed of. (Alok Mathur, J.)
Order Date :- 4.7.2025 Ravi/ Digitally signed by :- RAVI SHANKAR SRIVASTAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench