JAGRAM ALIAS JAGATRAM v. BOARD OF REVENUE, U.P., LUCKNOW THRU. CHAIRMAN AND 13 OTHERS
A227/3944/2025 · 2025-07-04
Alok Mathur
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 149295 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 149295 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:38014 Court No. - 6 Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 3944 of 2025 Petitioner :- Jagram Alias Jagatram Respondent :- Board Of Revenue, U.P., Lucknow Thru. Chairman And 13 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Daya Shankar Tiwari,Aditya Pandey Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Pankaj Gupta Hon'ble Alok Mathur,J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents.
2. In view of the order proposed to be passed, requirement of issuance of notice to private respondents are hereby dispensed with.
3. Instant petition has been filed by the petitioner praying for direction to the respondent No. 1/Chairman, Board of Revenue, U.P., Lucknow to decide the pending Revision No. REV/2565/2023 (Computerized Case No. R20230810002565 under Section 333 of U.P.Z.A. & L.R. Act (Jagram @ Jagatram Vs. Nan Babu & others) since 06.09.2023 expeditiously.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that grievance of the petition would be sufficiently met in case respondent No. 1/Chairman, Board of Revenue, U.P., Lucknow, considers and decides the aforesaid case in the time bound manner.
5. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection to the aforesaid prayer.
6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without entering into the merits, respondent No. 1/Chairman, Board of Revenue, U.P., Lucknow, is directed to decide Revision No. REV/2565/2023 (Computerized Case No. R20230810002565 under Section 333 of U.P.Z.A. & L.R. Act (Jagram @ Jagatram Vs. Nan Babu & others) since 06.09.2023, expeditiously, say within a period of six months from the date of production of certified copy of this order, in accordance with law, if there is no legal impediment.
7. It is further directed that the parties to the case shall cooperate in expeditious disposal of the case and shall not seek any unnecessary adjournment, neither any such adjournment
shall be granted by the Court concerned, except in exceptional circumstances.
8. With above observations/directions, the writ petition stands
disposed of. (Alok Mathur, J.)
Order Date :- 4.7.2025 Ravi/ Digitally signed by :- RAVI SHANKAR SRIVASTAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench