KRISHNA DEVI SHARMA AND ANR. v. SUDARSHAN PURI AND ORS.
CR/5283/2018 · 2025-08-19
Alka Sarin
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 14928 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 14928 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
283 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CR-5283-2018 (O&M)
Date of Decision : 19.08.2025
Krishna Devi Sharma and Another ... Petitioner(s) Versus Sudarshan Puri and Others
... Respondent(s)
CORAM : HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ALKA SARIN
Present : None.
ALKA SARIN, J. (Oral)
1.
The present revision petition has been filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a direction to the Court concerned to decide the main case for possession which is pending between the parties and for deciding the application for mesne profits.
2.
Notice of motion was issued in the present case on 30.10.2018. Thereafter, on 22.04.2025 learned counsel for the petitioners stated that he has no instructions. In view thereof, notices were issued to the petitioners. As per the office report, notices issued to the petitioners have been received back with the report that they are not residing at the given address.
3.
In view thereof, this Court is left with no other option but to dismiss the present petition for non-prosecution.
4.
Dismissed for non-prosecution. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed off.
19.08.2025 Ankur
( ALKA SARIN ) JUDGE
NOTE: Whether speaking/non-speaking: Speaking
Whether reportable: YES/NO
ANKUR GOYAL 2025.08.20 08:47 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this
order/judgment