AAMIR v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME U.P. LKO.
NA528/686/2025 · 2025-07-04
Subhash Vidyarthi
Special Leave Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 149229 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 149229 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:38028 Court No. - 15 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 686 of 2025 Applicant :- Aamir Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home U.P. Lko. Counsel for Applicant :- Sudhaker Prakash Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Subhash Vidyarthi,J.
1. Heard Sri Sudhaker Prakash, the learned counsel for the applicant as well as Sri Hans Raj Verma, the learned Additional Government Advocate and perused the records.
2. The present petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed with a prayer to allow the applicant to submit personal bonds and two sureties in one case which should be sufficient in three cases in which the applicant has been granted bail.
3. Learned counsel for the applicant submitted that it is impossible for the applicant to submit separate sureties in each case in which he has been granted bail. The learned counsel further submits that the applicant has been granted bail in all the cases. Despite the trial Court granting him bail, the applicant is still in jail inasmuch as the applicant being a poor person is unable to produce the sureties in each cases, details of which are as follows:- (i) Case Crime No. 52/2025, U/S-303 (2), 317(2), 317(4), 318(4) B.N.S., Police Station- Dubbaga, District-Lucknow. (ii) Case Crime No. 52/2025, U/S- 303 (2), 317(2), B.N.S., Police Station- Hasanganj, District- Lucknow. (iii) Case Crime No. 70/2025, U/S- 303(2), 317(2), 317(4), 341(1) B.N.S. Police Station- Aliganj, District-Lucknow.
4. It is further submitted by learned counsel for the applicant that in similar circumstances, namely, in the case of Hani
Nishad @ Mohammad Imran @ Vikky vs. The State of Uttar Pradesh [SLP (Crl.) No.8914-8915/2018) the Hon'ble Apex Court vide order dated 29.10.2018 has permitted the applicant to submit personal bonds and two sureties of heavy amount to hold good in all the cases.
5. Considering the aforesaid fact, the petition is disposed of and it is directed that the applicant shall furnish a personal bond of Rs. 50,000/- and two sureties of the like amount in one case which shall be treated to be valid in other three cases wherein the bail orders have been passed. . (Subhash Vidyarthi,J.) Order Date :- 4.7.2025 -Amit K- Digitally signed by :- AMIT KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench