Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 149185 (ALL)

SMT. NEELAM v. MADHYANCHAL VIDYUT VITRAN NIGAM LTD. THRU. MANAGING DIRECTOR AND 2 OTHERS

WRIC/6332/2025 · 2025-07-08

Om Prakash Shukla, Rajan Roy

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:38505-DB Court No. - 2 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 6332 of 2025 Petitioner :- Smt. Neelam Respondent :- Madhyanchal Vidyut Vitran Nigam Ltd. Thru. Managing Director And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Amitabh Kumar Tripathi,Ashish Kumar Shukla Counsel for Respondent :- Amit Kumar Dwivedi Hon'ble Rajan Roy,J. Hon'ble Om Prakash Shukla,J. 1. Heard. 2. Admittedly, there are dues on the premises in question where a new electricity connection has been sought by the petitioner. The premises were earlier occupied by some other person. Therefore, unless the dues are cleared, new electricity connection cannot be granted in view of Para 4.4 of the U.P. Electricity Supply Code, 2005. Moreover, counsel for the opposite parties says that the petitioner has herself given in writing that her tenant had committed the theft. 3. This is not a fit case for interference under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. Petitioner may avail other remedies, if any. 4. The writ petition is disposed of. [Om Prakash Shukla, J.] [Rajan Roy, J.] Order Date :- 8.7.2025 Santosh/- Digitally signed by :- SANTOSH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench