2025:JHHC:14569 1 | P a g e IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 3075 of 2025 ------ Bhola Ganjhu, aged about 30 years, S/o. Dilu Ganjhu, R/o. Vill.- Guruwe, P.O. Balubhang, P.S.- Balumath, Dist.- Latehar. … … Petitioner -Versus - The State of Jharkhand ... … Opposite Party ------ CORAM: - HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Ramesh Kumar, Advocate For the State : Mrs. Priya Shrestha, Spl. P.P. ------ 02/Dated: 05.06.2025 Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. The petitioner has moved before this Court for grant of privilege of anticipatory bail for the offence instituted under Sections 15(c), 17(c), 18(b) & 25 of the N.D.P.S. Act. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case as alleged in the F.I.R. It has further been submitted that the petitioner has nothing to do with the illegal cultivation of opium. It has also been submitted that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent. 4. Learned A.P.P. has opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail. 5. Having regard to the facts of the case, I am inclined to grant the privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioner as the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to surrender in the Court below within four weeks from today and in the event of his arrest or surrender, he will be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand Only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Special Judge, N.D.P.S. Act, Latehar in connection with Bariyatu P.S. Case No. 07/2025 with the condition that he will co-operate with the investigation of the case and appear before the investigating officer as and when noticed by him and furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhaar Card with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the pendency of the case and subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. It is made clear that if the petitioner does not 2025:JHHC:14569 2 | P a g e cooperate with the investigation/trial, the State would be at liberty to take appropriate action. (Deepak Roshan, J.) Sandeep-Rahul/-