SIDDAVATAM KAMAKSHI v. The State of Andhra Pradesh
WP/12008/2020 · 2025-09-17
Venkateswarlu Nimmagadda
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 14913 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 14913 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010187322020
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3329] THURSDAY,THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: 12008/2020 Between:
1. SIDDAVATAM
KAMAKSHI, SIDDAVATAM KAMAKSHI W/O SIDDAVATAM VENKATASWAMY AGED ABOUT 34YRS, OCC HOUSEHOLD R/O PAAPIREDDYPALLE VILLAGE RAMPADU, CHENNAVARAM YSR KADAPA DISTRICT
2. SIDDAMOORTHY RAGHU RAMI REDDY, S/O S.DURGI REDDY AGED ABOUT 27YRS,
R/O PAAPIREDDYPALLE VILLAGE RAMPADU , CHENNAVARAM YSR KADAPA DISTRICT
3. KALLURI NAGESWARI, W/O KALLURI MOHAN REDDY AGED ABOUT 28YRS, OCC HOUSEHOLD
R/O H.NO.1-48, PAAPIREDDYPALLE VILLAGE SRI AVADHUTA KASI NAYANA PORUMAMILLA, CHENNAVARAM YSR KADAPA DISTRICT
...PETITIONER(S) AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY PANCHAYATRAJ DEPARTMENT SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT
2. THE COMMISSIONER OF PANCHAYATRAJ, TADEPALLI, GUNTUR DISTRICT
3. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR AND DPCMGNREGS, KADAPA, YSR DISTRICT
4. THE JOINT COLLECTOR V WS AND D, YSR DISTRICT
2
5. THE ZILLA PRAJA PARISHAD, KADAPA, YSR DISTRICT REP. BY ITS CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
6. THE SUPERINTENDENT ENGINEER PANCHAYATRAJ, CIRCLE KADAPA, YSR DISTRICT
7. THE MANCINI PARISHAD DEVELOPMENT OFFICER, SRI AVADHUTA KASI NAYANA MANDAL YSR DISTRICT
8. THE JOINT DIRECTOR AGRICULTURE DEPARTMENT, KADAPA
9. THE RAMPADU GRAMPANCHAYAT, PAAPIREDDYPALLE VILLAGE SRI AVADHUTA KASI NAYANA MANDAL YSR DISTRICT
...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus to declare the delay and inaction on the part of respondents in commencing the construction of the Grama Sachivalayam building in Rampadu Grampanchayat in pursuant to the administrative sanction dt.24-04-2020 issued by the respondent No.3 as arbitrary, illegal and consequently direct the respondents to start the construction of the Grama Sachivalayam building in Rampadu Grampanchayat at the Headquarter at Paapireddypalle village, Sri Avadhuta Kasi Nayana Mandal, YSR Kadapa District as per Administrative Sanction orders dt. 24-04-2020 issued by respondent No.3 and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2020 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to start the construction of the Grama Sachivalayam building in Rampadu Grampanchayat at the Headquarter at Paapireddypalle village, Sri Avadhuta Kasi Nayana Mandal, YSR Kadapa District forthwith as per the orders dt.
24-04-2020 issued by respondent No.3 pending disposal of the Writ petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
1. B SARVOTHAM REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S):
3
1. GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ RURAL DEV
2. V VINOD K REDDY (SC FOR ZP MPDO GP) The Court made the following:
4
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA
WRIT PETITION NO: 12008/2020
ORDER:
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that since the Grama Sachivalayam building was already constructed, no further orders are necessary and the Writ Petition becomes infructuous.
Recording the said submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel miscellaneous application, pending, if any, shall also stand closed.
________________________________
VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA, J 1188..0099..22002255 TTPPSS
5
35
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA
WRIT PETITION NO:12008 of 2020 1188..0099..22002255 TTPPSS