Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:37850 Court No. - 6 Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 3915 of 2025 Petitioner :- Ramchandra Jaiswal Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Its Collector, Ayodhya And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Shitla Prasad Tripathi,Shivani Soni Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Mohan Singh Hon'ble Alok Mathur,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents. 2. In view of the order proposed to be passed, requirement of issuance of notice to respondents is hereby dispensed with. 3. Instant petition has been filed by the petitioner praying for direction to the respondent No. 2/ Dy. Director of Consolidation, Ayodhya to decide the preliminary objection dated 22.04.2025 pending in the Reference No. 480/2024/202454042300000318 (Mahesh Kumar Vs. Ramchandra and others) proceeding U/S 48(3) of the Uttar Pradesh Consolidation of Holding Act, 1953, expeditiously. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that a revision has been preferred by respondent No. 4 before the Dy. Director of Consolidation, Ayodhya sometimes in March, 2023 and confines his prayer only to a suitable direction to respondent No. 2/ Dy. Director of Consolidation, Ayodhya to decide the said revision with expedition. 5. Learned Standing Counsel does not objection to the innocuous prayer made by learned counsel for petitioner. 6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without entering into the merits, respondent respondent No. 2/ Dy. Director of Consolidation, Ayodhya, is directed to decide Reference No. 480/2024/202454042300000318 (Mahesh Kumar Vs. Ramchandra and others) proceeding U/S 48(3) of the Uttar Pradesh Consolidation of Holding Act, 1953, expeditiously, say within a period of four months from the date of production of certified copy of this order, in accordance with law, if there is no legal impediment. 7. It is further directed that the parties to the case shall cooperate in expeditious disposal of the case and shall not seek any unnecessary adjournment, neither any such adjournment shall be granted by the Court concerned, except in exceptional circumstances. 8. With above observations/directions, the writ petition stands disposed of. (Alok Mathur, J.) Order Date :- 4.7.2025 Ravi/ Digitally signed by :- RAVI SHANKAR SRIVASTAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench