Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
NC: 2025:KHC:1207 WP No. 36507 of 2015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 13TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI WRIT PETITION NO. 36507 OF 2015 (GM-RES) BETWEEN:
1.
M/S. UNIVERSAL POWER TRANSFORMER (P) LTD., A COMPANY INCORPORATED UNDER THE COMPANIES ACT 1956 AND HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT 26 A. 2ND PHASE, PEENYA INDISTRIAL AREA, BANGALORE-560 058.
REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, MR. DHRUVA TALWALKAR.
2.
MR. DHRUVA TALWALKAR SON OF DR. P.A.TALWALKAR, AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, RESIDING AT 302, EMBASSY WOODS, CUNNINGHAM ROAD, BANGALORE-560 001. …PETITIONERS (BY SMT. AMRITH JAYAPRAKASH., ADVOCATE FOR SRI. AJESH KUMAR.S., ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
UNION OF INDIA MINISTRY OF MICRO SMALL AND MEDIUM ENTERPRISES, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, UDYOGA BHAVAN, NEW DELHI-110 011.
2.
MICRO SMALL AND MEDIUM ENTERPRISES OFFICE OF THE DEVELOPMENT COMMISSIONER
Digitally signed by THEJASKUMAR N Location: High Court of Karnataka
- 2 -
NC: 2025:KHC:1207 WP No. 36507 of 2015
(MSME), 'A' WING, 7TH FLOOR, NIRMAN BHAVAN, NEW DELHI-110 108.
REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR.
3.
M/S. PRADEEP TRANSCORE (P) LTD., G-40, 41, 48, H-20, UPSIDC INDUSTRIAL AREA, NAINI ALLAHABAD-211 010.
REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. KUMAR.M.N., CGC FOR R1 & 2;
SRI. KUMAR.H.D., ADVOCATE FOR SRI. VENKATESH.S.ARABATTI., ADVOCATE FOR R3)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS.
THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER:
ORAL ORDER
Smt.Amritha Jayaprakash., counsel on behalf of Sri.Ajesh Kumar.S., for the petitioners has appeared in person. Counsel submits that a memo has been filed stating that the Writ Petition may be dismissed as withdrawn. Counsel therefore, submits that the memo may be placed on record and the Writ Petition may be dismissed as withdrawn. When queried, counsel Smt.Amritha Jayaprakash., submits that a conscious decision is taken by the advocate on
- 3 -
NC: 2025:KHC:1207 WP No. 36507 of 2015
record and the petitioners to withdraw the Writ Petition and if an order is passed, they shall not seek for recalling the same or file a review petition. The oral submission made by counsel for the petitioners and the memo is placed on record. The Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
Sd/- (JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE TKN List No.: 3 Sl No.: 9.1