HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 6171 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, Shri J.P. Shukla, Advocate holding brief of Shri Vinay Kumar, learned counsel appearing for the informant as well as learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the material available on record. 2. The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in F.I.R./Case Crime No. 67 of 2025, under Sections 137(2), 70(2) of B.N.S. & Section 5(g)/6 of The Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, Police Station Rupaideeha, District Bahraich. 3. The F.I.R. in question was lodged for the missing person, alleging that the daughter of the informant, aged about 16 years was enticed by the applicant, subsequently, in the statement recorded under Section 180 BNSS, the victim stated that her mother use to scold her as such she left her home on 15.03.2025 and went to Nepal and started doing domestic work there, she specifically refused that anyone has enticed her, however, in the statement recorded under Section 183 BNSS, the victim stated that she used to talk with the applicant and use to like, the applicant and had gone to Jaipur where, physical relations were also formed against her consent. It was also stated that both of them stayed for 10 days in a room. She also stated that she was given grapes and apple to eat. The medical report, which is on record, does not corroborate any injury, the tentative age of the victim is around 16 years and 06 months. 4. Learned A.G.A. has opposed the bail application. 5. Considering the variation in the two statements coupled with the fact that the victim has stayed with the applicant over a span of 10 days and the Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Rama Shankar Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A., Ashutosh Srivastava, Sumit Chauhan, Vinay Kumar Mohd. Rahim @ Laddan .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And 3 Others .....Opposite Party(s) medical does not corroborate the allegation, the applicant who is in custody since 31.05.2025 and has no criminal antecedents, is enlarged on bail. In view thereof, the bail application is allowed. 6. Let the applicant- Mohd. Rahim @ Laddan be released on bail in aforesaid FIR number on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties of Rs. 20,000/- each to the satisfaction of court concerned with the following conditions: (a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which she is accused or suspected of the commission; and; (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. October 7, 2025 Praveen BAIL No. 6171 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- PRAVEEN KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench