Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 149081 (ALL)

VIPIN SRIVASTAVA @ VIPIN KUMAR SRIVASTAVA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO.

NA528/687/2025 · 2025-07-04

Subhash Vidyarthi

Special Leave Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:38022 Court No. - 15 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 687 of 2025 Applicant :- Vipin Srivastava @ Vipin Kumar Srivastava Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. Counsel for Applicant :- Pawan Kumar Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Subhash Vidyarthi,J. 1. Heard Sri Pawan Kumar Singh, the learned counsel for the applicant as well as Sri Hans Raj Verma, the learned Additional Government Advocate and perused the record. 2. The present petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed with a prayer to allow the applicant to submit personal bonds and two sureties in one case which should be sufficient in all four cases in which the applicant has been granted bail. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant submit that it is impossible for the applicant to submit separate sureties in each case in which he has been granted bail. The learned counsel further submits that the applicant has been granted bail in all the cases. Despite the trial Court granting him bail, the applicant is still in jail inasmuch as the applicant being a poor person is unable to produce the sureties in each cases, details of which are as follows:- (i) Case Crime No. 212 of 2025, under Sections 317(2), 303(2) BNS, Police Station Thakurganj, District- Lucknow. (ii) Case Crime No. 233 of 2025, under Section 317(2), 303(2), 317(4) BNS, Police Station Madiyaon, District Lucknow. (iii) Case Crime No. 234 of 2025, under Sections 317(2), 303(2), 317(4) BNS, Police Station Madiyaon, District Lucknow. (iv) Case Crime No. 235 of 2025, under Section 317(2), 317(4) BNS, Police Station Madiyaon, District Lucknow. 4. It is further submitted by learned counsel for the applicant that in similar circumstances, namely, in the case of Hani Nishad @ Mohammad Imran @ Vikky vs. The State of Uttar Pradesh [SLP (Crl.) No.8914-8915/2018) the Hon'ble Apex Court vide order dated 29.10.2018 has permitted the applicant to submit personal bonds and two sureties of heavy amount to hold good in all the cases. 5. Considering the aforesaid fact, the petition is disposed of and it is directed that the applicant shall furnish a personal bond of Rs.50,000/- and two sureties of the like amount in one case which shall be treated to be valid in other three cases wherein the bail orders have been passed. . (Subhash Vidyarthi,J.) Order Date :- 4.7.2025 -Amit K- Digitally signed by :- AMIT KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench