Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 14908 (KAR)

SRI. K. CHIKKEGOWDA MEMORIAL EDUCATION SOCIETY v. THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

WP/34805/2015 · 2025-02-19

N S Sanjay Gowda

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:7530 WP No. 34805 of 2015 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 19TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N S SANJAY GOWDA WRIT PETITION NO. 34805 OF 2015 (LB-RES) BETWEEN: SRI. K. CHIKKEGOWDA MEMORIAL EDUCATION SOCIETY, NAGAVARA, CHANNAPATNA TQ, RAMANAGARA DISTRICT, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, SMT. R.C. LAKSHAMMA. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. S.C. VIJAYA KUMAR, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, ZILLA PANCHAYATH, RAMANAGARA DISTRICT, RAMANAGARA - 571 501. 2. THE EXECUTIVE OFFICER, CHANNAPATNA TALUK PANCHAYATH, CHANNAPATNA, RAMANAGARA DISTRICT - 562 108. 3. THE PANCHAYATH DEVELOPMENT OFFICER, NAGAVARA GRAMAPANCHAYATH, KASABA HOBLI, CHANNAPATNA TALUK, RAMANAGAR DISTRICT - 562 108. 4. SHIVALINGAIAH S/O LATE BOREGOWDA, Digitally signed by KAVYA R Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:7530 WP No. 34805 of 2015 AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, R/O NAGAVARA, KASABA HOBLI, CHANNAPATNA TALUK, RAMANAGARA DISTRICT - 562 108. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. B.J. SOMAYAJI, ADVOCATE FOR R1 TO 3; SRI. N. NAGARAJA, ADVOCATE FOR R4) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO CALL FOR THE RECORDS. QUASH THE IMPUGNED ORDER PASSED BY THE R-2 DATED 18.11.2011 VIDE ANNEX-E BY ISSUING WRIT OF CERTIORARI AND ETC., THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N S SANJAY GOWDA ORAL ORDER 1. The petitioner is aggrieved with the registration of Khata in favour of the fourth respondent. 2. In my view, since the petitioner is claiming rights over the said property, he would necessarily have to approach the Civil Court and establish his right over the said property. - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:7530 WP No. 34805 of 2015 3. In the event, the petitioner were to approach the Civil Court and secure an appropriate decree, it is needless to state that the authorities would be bound by the said decree and will have to change the entries accordingly. 4. Subject to the above, the writ petition is dismissed. Sd/- (N S SANJAY GOWDA) JUDGE DHA List No.: 1 Sl No.: 24 CT: BHK