APHC010187082020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] THURSDAY, THE FOURTEENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 11989/2020 Between: 1. SMT. CHERUKURI SANDYARANI,, W/O. LATE COL. RATNA KUMAR (RTD.), AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, R/O. 3-143-B, NIRVANA 5TH FLOOR, KAVURI HILLS, MADHAPUR, HYDERABAD-81. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY IT'S PRINCIPLE SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETERIAT, VELGAPUDI, AMARAVATI. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, ELLURU, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 3. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, III TOWN POLICE STATION, ELURU, W.G. DISTRICT. 4. SRI K V RAMANA, S.I,III TOWN POLICE STATION, ELURU, W.G. DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. VENKATESWARA RAO GUDAPATI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “.... a writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus to declare the action of the respondents 1 to 4 a) Not to interfere with the petitioners possession in the property admeasuring an extent of 485 sq yds in T S No 701 and 702 in Ramakrishnapuram Eluru contrary to order passed by the Honble High Court of Andhra Pradesh in I A No 1 of 2018 in A S No 1681 of 2018 dated 26102018 b0 To direct the 4th respondent not to interfere with my possession of the property and further to direct them to restore the power supply c) To conduct enquiry against the 4th respondent for his high handed action against the petitioner abusing his official power and wrongfully confining the petitioner as arbitrary 2 illegal null and void and violative of Article 21 of the Constitution of India.” 2. Sri Md.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home would submit that the police are not interfering in the civil disputes between the parties. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the Court may pass appropriate orders. 4. In that view, the Writ Petition is disposed of. However, the police are directed not to interfere in the civil disputes between the parties. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. ________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date:14.08.2025 Asr 3 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.11989 of 2020 Dt.14.08.2025 Asr