Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 149078 (ALL)

RAGINI SRIVASTAVA AND 11 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. BASIC EDU. LKO AND 5 OTHERS

WRIA/7068/2025 · 2025-07-03

Abdul Moin

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:37450 Court No. - 5 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 7068 of 2025 Petitioner :- Ragini Srivastava And 11 Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Basic Edu. Lko And 5 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Vinod Kumar Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Ran Vijay Singh,Rishabh Tripathi Hon'ble Abdul Moin,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondents No.1 & 2, Shri Ran Vijay Singh, learned counsel appearing for respondent No.3 and Shri Arun Kumar Singh holding brief of Shri Rishabh Tripathi, learned counsel appearing for respondents No.1 to 4. 2. With the consent of the parties, the matter is being decided finally. 3. The petitioners are before this Court praying for a writ of mandamus commanding the respondents to grant benefit of selection grade to them on completion of 10 years of regular service on the post of Assistant Teacher in Primary School in pursuance of the Government Order dated 20.12.2001. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioners contends that with respect to the teachers similarly circumstanced the respondents have passed order dated 28.11.2024 granting the selection grade pay. 5. Learned counsel for the petitioners after arguing at some length submits that with regard to the relief sought in the writ petition, the petitioners may be permitted to submit fresh representations before respondent no.3 which may be directed to be decided within a time frame fixed by this Court to which learned counsels for respondents have no objection. 6. In view of the above, it is provided that in case the petitioners submit individual representations within two weeks from today before respondent no.3, then respondent no.3 shall endevour to decide the same by means of a reasoned and speaking order within a further period of three months from the date of submission of the representations along with certified copy of this order. 7. With the aforesaid direction, writ petition is disposed of. 8. It is made clear that this Court has not gone into the merits of the case. Order Date :- 3.7.2025 prateek Digitally signed by :- PRATEEK ARORA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench