Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 149054 (ALL)

PRATAP YADAV v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. OF REVENUE LKO. AND 6 OTHERS

WRIC/6415/2025 · 2025-07-16

Om Prakash Shukla, Rajan Roy

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:40540-DB Court No. - 2 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 6415 of 2025 Petitioner :- Pratap Yadav Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Revenue Lko. And 6 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Anurag Pathak,Anju Vaishya,Sarojani Misra,Sonal Pandey Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Dilip Kumar Pandey,Namit Sharma Hon'ble Rajan Roy,J. Hon'ble Om Prakash Shukla,J. Sri K.K. Pandey, Advocate has filed his power on behalf of the Nagar Nigam, Lucknow, which is taken on record. Heard. Petitioner wants his name to be recorded in respect of Gata No.455 as bhumidhar based on some patta granted to him by the Land Management Committee dated 20.11.1966 and also that he should not be evicted from that land. Learned counsel for the Nagar Nigam, Lucknow says that the land is at present recorded as banjar and is within the limit of Municipal Corporation, Lucknow. This is not a matter to be considered under Article 226 of the Constitution of India certainly not after so many years. The petitioner may, if there are other remedies prescribed under law, avail the same. Writ Petition stands disposed of. (Om Prakash Shukla,J.) (Rajan Roy,J.) Order Date :- 16.7.2025 Saurabh Digitally signed by :- SAURABH VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench