[2025:RJ-JP:28355] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 4806/2025 Vijendra Singh S/o Amar Singh, Aged About 35 Years, R/o Village Hanauta, Police Station Maniya, District Dholpur (Rajasthan) (At Present In District Jail, Bharatpur). ----Petitioner Versus The State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent Connected With S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 4965/2025 Rajesh @ Raju @ Bankat S/o Brijmohan, Aged About 50 Years, R/o Khidki Darwaja Weir, Police Station Weir, District Bharatpur (At Present Confined In Central Jail Bharatpur). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Kapil Bhardwaj Mr. Dinesh Kumar Pathak For Respondent(s) : Mr. Jaiprakash Tiwari, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR Order 28/07/2025 1. The petitioners have preferred these bail applications under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.26/2025 registered at Police Station-Garhi Bajana, District-Bharatpur for the offences under Section 3/25(6) of Arms Act. 2. Since both the bail applications have arisen from common order, hence, they are being decided by this single order. [2025:RJ-JP:28355] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-4806/2025] 3. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have falsely been implicated in this case. The allegation against the accused-petitioner-Vijendra Singh is that from his conscious possession, three country made pistols were recovered and allegation against the accused-petitioner-Rajesh @ Raju @ Bankat is that from his conscious possession one country made pistol is recovered. The case is triable by Magistrate. He submits that though seven cases are pending against accused-petitioner- Vijendra Singh and four cases are pending against accused- petitioner-Rajesh @ Raju @ Bankat, petitioners are behind the bars since 12.03.2025. Charge-sheet has been filed. The trial of the case may take considerable time, therefore, no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioners in further custody, hence the bail application of the petitioners may be allowed. 5. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail applications. 6. On consideration of the rival submission and material available on record and deliberating all the facts and circumstances of the case and without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioners. 7. Accordingly, the bail applications under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is ordered that the petitioners-Vijendra Singh S/o Amar Singh and Rajesh @ Raju @ Bankat S/o Brijmohan shall be released on bail on their furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the [2025:RJ-JP:28355] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-4806/2025] satisfaction of the learned trial court for their appearance before that Court on all the dates till conclusion of the trial. (PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J Arun/2-3