MANEESH SRIVASTAVA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. TOURISM LKO. AND 2 OTHERS
WRIA/7032/2025 · 2025-07-03
Manish Mathur
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 148997 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 148997 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:37400 Court No. - 18 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 7032 of 2025 Petitioner :- Maneesh Srivastava Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Tourism Lko. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Pradeep Tiwari Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Manish Mathur,J.
1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned State Counsel for opposite parties.
2. Petition has been filed challenging order dated 13.06.2024 whereby petitioner has been transferred from District Lucknow to Gorakhpur.
3. It has been submitted that impugned order has been passed without considering serious medical condition of petitioner pertaining to heart disease and that he is undergoing treatment at Lucknow which would be severely hampered in case he is compelled to join in pursuance of impugned order.
4. For the said grievance, petitioner has already submitted a representation but seeks liberty to file a fresh representation before the authority concerned.
5. Considering innocuous prayer being made by learned counsel for petitioner and without entering into the merits of the case, petitioner is granted liberty to file a fresh representation within a period of three days from today before opposite party No. 2 i.e. Director General, Department of Tourism, Lucknow, U.P. In case such a representation is filed, the same shall be decided by the said authority within period of ten days from the date of its receipt.
6. With the aforesaid discussions, petition stands disposed of. Order Date :- 3.7.2025 Satish Digitally signed by :- SATISH KUMAR BHARATI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench