Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Himachal Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 14898 (HP)

VIJAY PAL RUHELA v. ARYA PRATINIDHI SABHA PUNJAB

CR/140/2014 · 2025-06-04

Vivek Singh Thakur

Civil Appealbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

( 2025:HHC:17614 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Civil Revision No.140 of 2014 Date of decision: 4th June, 2025 Vijay Pal Ruhela …Petitioner Versus Arya Pratinidhi Sabha Punjab …Respondents Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Vivek Singh Thakur, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? For the Petitioner: Mr. Vikas Rathore, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. Nimish Gupta, Advocate. Vivek Singh Thakur, Judge This petition has been filed against the judgment dated 26.6.2014 passed by the Appellate Authority, Chamba, in Civil Appeal (Rent) No. 8/13/12 titled Vijay Pal Ruhela vs. Arya Pratinidhi Sabha Punjab, whereby order dated 30th August, 2012 passed by the Rent Controller, Chamba in Rent Petition No.4 of 2009 titled Arya Pratinidhi Sabha Punjab vs. Vijay Pal Ruhela and others, has been affirmed and petitioner has been ordered to be evicted. 2 It has been submitted by learned counsel for petitioner that during pendency of present petition, matter has been amicably settled and after termination of earlier tenancy, fresh tenancy has been created by executing a deed in favour of petitioner No.2 Chander Bose Ruhela ( 2025:HHC:17614 ) son of Shri Zila Singh with fresh terms and conditions agreed upon between the parties. 3 It has been submitted that in view of aforesaid facts, petitioners are not pressing present Civil Revision Petition as previous tenancy stands terminated and petitioners shall be deemed to have been evicted in compliance of impugned order which was challenged in present Civil Revision Petition and thereafter, Chander Bose Ruhela has to be considered to have been inducted afresh as stated supra. 4 It has been further submitted by learned counsel for petitioners that in view of above, present petition is not pressed. Accordingly, petition is dismissed as not pressed. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. (Vivek Singh Thakur), Judge. 4th June, 2025(MS) 2