Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 148938 (ALL)

USMAN @ USMAN ALI AND OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME AFFAIRS LKO. AND OTHERS

CRLP/5897/2025 · 2025-07-03

Brij Raj Singh, Sangeeta Chandra

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:37630-DB Court No. - 9 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 5897 of 2025 Petitioner :- Usman @ Usman Ali And Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Affairs Lko. And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Deo Prakash Srivastava Counsel for Respondent :- G.A. Hon'ble Mrs. Sangeeta Chandra, J. Hon'ble Brij Raj Singh, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned A.G.A. appearing for the State-opposite parties no.1 to 3 and perused the record. 2. This writ petition seeks issuance of direction in the nature of Certiorari for quashing the impugned F.I.R. dated 20.06.2025 bearing No.0211 of 2025, under Section 191(2), 191(3), 190, 352 and 351(3) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, Police Station Paraspur, District Gonda. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that the offence as alleged in FIR has maximum punishment for the term less than seven years imprisonment, whereas the police is trying to arrest the petitioners, which is against the mandates of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. 4. Learned AGA appearing for the State/opposite parties has given a statement on behalf of investigating agency that because the offences allegedly committed by the petitioners entail sentence of less than seven years, provisions of Section 35(3) of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 shall be strictly followed in terms of the judgment rendered by Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Arnesh Kumar Vs. State of Bihar and another, reported in (2014) 8 SCC 273. 5. Considering the stand of the investigating agency, learned counsel for the petitioners states that let this petition be disposed of in view of the above said facts. 6. Accordingly, this petition is disposed of in view of the provisions of Section 35(3) of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 and the law as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Arnesh Kumar (supra). . (Brij Raj Singh, J.) (Sangeeta Chandra, J.) Order Date :- 3.7.2025 Rao/- Digitally signed by :- CHEBROLU SRINIVASA RAO High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- CHEBROLU SRINIVASA RAO High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench