RAM GOPAL AND ANOTHER v. THE STATE OF U.P. THRU. ITS ADDL. CHIEF SECY. REVENUE DEPTT. LKO. AND 5 OTHERS
A227/3904/2025 · 2025-07-03
Alok Mathur
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 148911 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 148911 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:37682 Court No. - 6 Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 3904 of 2025 Petitioner :- Ram Gopal And Another Respondent :- The State Of U.P. Thru. Its Addl. Chief Secy. Revenue Deptt. Lko. And 5 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Pal Singh Yadav,Ashish Kumar Singh,Prathama Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Alok Mathur, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents. 2. The present petition has been filed with the following prayer(s):
"i. To pass appropriate order or direction, directing the learned Court of Tehsildar Judicial, Tehsil Bakshi Ka Talab, Lucknow, to decide the application (CASE No. -T202310460420190) under section 209(J) of the U.P. Revenue Code filed by the petitioners as contained in Annexure No.1 to this petition, expeditiously within stipulated time as directed by this Hon'ble Court. ii. To pass appropriate order or direction, directing the parties to maintain status quo till final disposal of the application under section 209(J) of the U.P. Revenue Code. iii. To pass appropriate order or direction, directing the parties to maintain status quo till final disposal of the application under order 39 Rule 1 and 2 C.P.C. filed by the petitioners. iv. any other order or direction which this Hon'ble court may deem, fit, just and proper may also kindly be passed in favour of the petitioners."
3. In view of the order proposed to be passed, requirement of issuance of notice to private respondents is hereby dispensed with. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the application for recall of order dated 28.09.2024 was filed on 19.06.2025 and accordingly prayer for expeditious disposal of the aforesaid application has been made. 5. It is noticed that hardly 15 days have passed since the petitioner filed the aforesaid application and no unreasonable period has lapsed, requiring interference by this Court under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, accordingly, we decline
the prayer to expedite the said application. However, in case there is urgency in the matter, it is open for the petitioner to move suitable application in the Court/ Authority concerned, who shall consider and decide the same within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of such application, after giving opportunity of hearing to all the parties, in accordance with law, if there is no legal impediment. 6.
It is further directed that the parties to the case shall co- operate in disposal of such application and shall not seek any unnecessary adjournment, neither any such adjournment shall be granted by the Court concerned, except in exceptional circumstances. 7. With above observations/directions, the writ petition stands
disposed of.
Order Date :- 3.7.2025 (Manoj K.) (Alok Mathur, J.) Digitally signed by :- MANOJ KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench